Securing APIs for Dummies
As your organization’s use of APIs expands, your…
Application programming interfaces (APIs) have revolutionized the face of cloud computing, making it easier than ever for different cloud technologies to communicate with one another — thereby bringing enormous value to users by connecting different cloud-based solutions.
However, APIs are increasingly being targeted by malevolent actors to find creative backdoors into high-value targets. APIs — by design — rely upon organizations provisioning internet-exposed endpoints which return user data and services in response to targeted queries. Without robust API security in place, this provides an attractive target for hackers who can attempt to exploit the API to gain direct unauthorized data or even use the data it returns to attempt to reverse engineer the main application. Increasingly, this is exactly what defensive teams are witnessing in the field.
API-targeting exploits can include everything from attacks that target websites (such as brute force methodologies intended to suppress API availability to legitimate users) to attempts to flood endpoints with queries to illicitly obtain user information and DDoS-style query-flooding.
In this blog post, we’re going to explain the differences between three different security tools that can protect various parts of a company’s online footprint: WAFs, API gateways, and API security platforms. Increasingly, all three of these components are considered essential components of the API-protection stack, working at different levels of the TCP/IP model in order to protect APIs from malicious targeting.
We’ll explain exactly what independent value each of these solutions brings, how they work together, and why defense-focused organizations should be deploying all three to better manage their security.
API gateways are designed to handle authentication and authorization of requests to access an API. API gateways work at the network level but, more specifically, they handle incoming traffic requests specifically seeking the API.
In a typical network architecture, API gateways are placed immediately before API endpoints — serving as access control points. Core API gateway functionalities include:
Web application firewalls (WAFs) form an additional layer of the API protection stack. WAFs protect web assets — including APIs — from malicious traffic originating from outside of the local network.
As API technology continues to be deployed, some APIs are reserved exclusively for internal use (so-called “east-west” usage within a data center or another type of local network). The majority, however, are exposed to the internet (“north-south”).
Relative to API gateways, WAFs are intended to provide more advanced security controls than simple rule-based logic. Instead, WAFs are essential security firewalls for any organization operating public-facing online infrastructure — which, these days, is most companies.
Companies that provision API endpoints that can only be accessed from within a LAN may feel confident in only using an API gateway to protect access to the endpoint. However, for the majority of organizations, a WAF will be an essential add-on to the gateway.
WAFs can deliver the following additional features that gateways generally don’t include:
In simpler language: the API gateway provides basic access point control to the API endpoint ensuring that those accessing it are likely to be legitimate and/or accredited users. WAFs, by contrast, are security oriented, adding a vital additional layer of protection.
In order for every security tool to be useful, it needs to have some kind of interface to allow human operators to observe activity based on preconfigured triggers (this function is commonly called monitoring). It also needs to provide some means for human operators to enable changes to the configuration of the tools it contains.
This is where API security platforms — like Noname Security — come into the picture. API security platforms tie up all the monitoring and remediation functions of utilities intended to secure APIs.
Common functionalities of API security platforms include:
In the API security stack, the API security platform can be thought of as the orchestrator that enables the security team to ensure that all components of the API-protecting infrastructure are working in harmony.
In a simple threat landscape, APIs would need basic security measures such as access control lists designed to ensure that only legitimate actors have access to the endpoints.
Unfortunately, that kind of threat landscape no longer exists. As APIs continue to rise in importance in the interconnected world of cloud computing, APIs become increasingly attractive as targets for malicious actors. Therefore, multifaceted security measures designed to protect against both internal and external hostile actors are necessary.
Best-in-class API security leverages a number of protective mechanisms to ensure that APIs remain as diligently protected as the users attempting to target them. This includes API gateways that provide basic access control. WAFs that deliver holistic API security protection against both API endpoints and other web-exposed services. And finally, an API security platform that ties all the functionalities together and is specially designed to protect against these new attack patterns.
When comparing API gateway vs. WAFs, it’s essential to note that API gateways and WAFs can be used together to create a robust defense strategy for web applications.
API gateways excel at managing and optimizing the flow of traffic between clients and APIs. They ensure proper routing, composition, and caching to enhance API management. WAFs are crucial to any API security checklist and specialize in protecting applications from cyber threats. By integrating API gateways and WAFs, the gateway efficiently handles traffic, while the WAF focuses on securing against potential threats, creating a comprehensive solution for API management and security.
When comparing WAFs vs API security platforms, a platform like Noname Security elevates the synergy between API gateways and WAFs. Our advanced threat detection capabilities follow API security best practices and add an extra layer of security, ensuring that APIs are protected against evolving risks. API security testing is an integral part of our approach to ensure that the integrated API gateway and WAFs function seamlessly and securely. Request a demo to explore how our API security platform can fit your specific needs.
Both API gateways and WAFs can scale, but they emphasize different aspects. API gateways focus on traffic management scalability, ensuring they can efficiently handle a high volume of API requests. On the other hand, WAFs prioritize security scaling, gearing their capabilities toward handling a large volume of requests while maintaining robust security measures.
API gateways achieve scalability by distributing traffic across multiple servers and efficiently managing the routing and composition of requests. WAFs scale horizontally to handle increasing request volumes by adding more instances to the network. Both tools can adapt to growing demand without compromising their primary functions.
Both API gateways and WAFs can enhance the user experience when properly configured. API gateways contribute to optimized response times, efficient traffic routing, and caching, resulting in a seamless user experience.
By ensuring robust security measures, WAFs prevent attacks that could otherwise disrupt service. Combining these tools improves user experience with minimized latency, optimal response times, and effective error handling.
The cost of implementing API gateways vs WAFs depends on factors like licensing models, usage-based charges, and provider-specific features. Costs vary based on deployment scale, chosen features, and selected providers.
Careful consideration of the project requirements is also crucial to align the investment with the desired outcomes, ensuring a cost-effective and efficient security solution.